Don't act surprised: Donald Trump was
never going to accept the election results if he lost
Trump has no credibility when he claims the election was stolen
— because he always accuses opponents of cheating
Though the media took his denial of election reality as a
shock, President Donald Trump was never going to accept the results of this
year's election unless he was declared the winner. He said so himself
years ago.
This is the elephant in the room, the undeniable fact that
demolishes his credibility when he says he was actually reelected — and,
incidentally, the reason why both he and the people backing his unprecedented
post-election temper tantrum will be remembered by history as forever
losers. Indeed, long before the 2020 election, Trump's go-to
response to even the possibility of losing any election has been to accuse the
other side of cheating.
During the 2016
Republican presidential primaries, after he lost the Iowa caucuses to Sen.
Ted Cruz of Texas, he claimed that he wasn't actually defeated in the Hawkeye
State because Cruz "stole it." He also argued that Cruz's supposed
"fraud" was so egregious that "either a new election should take
place or Cruz results nullified." Although he moved on from his claims
about Cruz after he ultimately won the GOP nomination, Trump accused Democratic
nominee Hillary Clinton of doing dishonest things "at many polling
places" without providing any evidence. He repeatedly insisted that the election was "rigged"
against him, a point that Clinton raised during one of their debates when she
observed that he even accused the Emmys of being "rigged"
against him when he was snubbed for his work on "The Apprentice."
During that same debate he refused to answer a question about whether he would
accept the 2016 election results if they went against him, merely saying he
would keep America "in suspense" and "look at it at the
time." At an Ohio rally weeks
before the election, Trump said that he would only accept the results of the
upcoming election "if I win."
Although Trump defeated
Clinton because of his Electoral College victory (306 to 232 — at least before certain electors
defected — which coincidentally is the same margin by
which he lost to former Vice President Joe Biden in 2020), he lost in the popular
vote by 65.9 million votes (48.2%) to 63 million votes (46.1%). Once again, he
blamed fraud. He told his supporters that "I won the popular vote if you
deduct the millions of people who voted illegally," although he
provided no evidence of any large number of people voting illegally, much
less the 3 million necessary to account for his popular vote deficit. Trump
eventually created a voter fraud commission to look into the claim of illegal voting,
but it was disbanded after the members found no evidence of widespread voter
fraud.
Trump pulled the exact
same stunt in 2020. After getting himself
impeached for trying to pressure Ukraine into smearing
Biden, Trump found himself running against the former vice president anyway,
and polls repeatedly showed Biden with an advantage over the
incumbent. Because Biden voters were disproportionately likely to vote by mail
as a result of the pandemic, Trump tried to preemptively cast doubt over the
reliability of mail-in voting, even though his claims were rejected in court and debunked by experts. This laid the groundwork for him to later claim
that there were "vote dumps" against him during the 2020 election
because, as he knew, mail-in ballots tend to be counted after in-person ones,
meaning that news outlets reporting on the results would initially show Trump
having large leads before all of the Biden votes began to erode them. In a
similar vein, Trump also tried to
kneecap the Post Office, a move that critics claimed was motivated by a desire to
hinder mail-in voting. (Trump later admitted that he took money away from the Post Office
so the US "can't have universal mail-in voting.")
He also repeated the
same "if I lose, it's rigged" rhetoric he employed in 2016. At an
August rally in Wisconsin, Trump told his supporters that "the only way
we're going to lose this election is if the election is rigged." In one of
his debates with Biden, the president made a number of
unsubstantiated claims about voter fraud, from claiming 80 million mail-in ballots could
not be securely sent in and citing examples of normal human error when it comes
to managing mail as evidence of a widespread conspiracy against him to falsely
claiming pro-Trump poll watchers were being banned in Pennsylvania and postal
workers were selling ballots in West Virginia. Shortly before the
election, Trump told Fox News' Chris Wallace that he would
not "give a direct answer" about whether he'd accept election results
that were unfavorable to him, instead arguing "I'm not going to just say
'yes.' I'm not going to say no and I didn't last time either." He also
told Wallace that is not a "good loser" before adding that
"mail-in voting is going to rig the election."
On Election Day, Trump prematurely
claimed that he had won and on the day after the election tweeted, "They
are finding Biden votes all over the place — in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and
Michigan. So bad for our Country!" He repeated this two days after the
election, telling reporters that "I've been talking about mail-in voting
for a long time. It's really destroyed our system. It's a corrupt system. And
it makes people corrupt even if they aren't by nature, but they become corrupt;
it's too easy. They want to find out how many votes they need, and then they
seem to be able to find them. They wait and wait and then they find them."
Then, exactly as anticipated, he falsely claimed that votes were being "dumped" as mail-in ballots revealed he had actually
lost despite the in-person ballots initially giving the impression he was
winning. After every vote was counted, it was revealed that 81.3 million
Americans voted for Biden (51.3%) and 74.2 million Americans voted for
Trump (46.9%).
To be clear, this is not
the only reason Trump's claims of having been robbed lack all credibility. At
the time of this writing, Trump has lost 59
of the cases he has brought to court supposedly alleging voter fraud
(many actually did not do so but were merely presented to the public as
if they did), with many of the judges who ruled against him being fellow
Republicans, including some he appointed. (The only legal case he won had nothing to do with voter fraud but about
how much extra time first-time voters in Pennsylvania could get to confirm
their identifications in order for their mail-in votes to be counted.) Overall more than 90 federal and
state judges have rejected Trump's legal challenges to the Election
Day results. His own attorney general William Barr, who was a notorious toady, admitted that after a thorough investigation he
did not uncover any evidence of
fraud that could change the 2020 election results.
(Trump fired him for this, of course.) The Supreme Court unanimously declared that Trump's fraud accusations had no merit,
a decision that included the three judges appointed by the president himself. Republican leaders in the swing states of Arizona, Georgia,
Michigan and Pennsylvania have refused to overturn their results because they
know it would be illegal for them to do so.
At this point the president and his legal team have resorted to gish
galloping, or attempting to win an argument by overwhelming an
opponent with an excessive number of spurious claims — that all of these
Republican and/or pro-Trump judges and officials are part of a giant conspiracy
to steal the election from him, that large numbers of dead people voted, that
Dominion voting machines changed results, and so on — in the hope that they
will not be able to keep track of and thereby comprehensively debunk all of
them. As my colleague Amanda
Marcotte has
written, there is evidence that many Trump supporters don't even
sincerely believe that the election was stolen, but are making intentionally
bad faith arguments out of a mixture of partisanship, wounded pride, a desire
to delegitimize President-elect Joe Biden and the hope that they can
perhaps help the president pull off a coup.
Yet they would not be doing this if Trump himself had not set
the example that it is okay to deny an election's results unless you are
declared the winner. All of the lawsuits, the outraged tweets and the
"Stop The Steal" protests boil down to that single fact. Trump spent
years before his presidency arguing that if he did not win an election, it
would not count. Now he and his supporters are simply following that authoritarian
argument to its inevitable, hateful conclusion.
MATTHEW ROZSA
Matthew Rozsa is a staff writer for Salon. He
holds an MA in History from Rutgers University-Newark and is ABD in his PhD
program in History at Lehigh University. His work has appeared in Mic, Quartz
and MSNBC.
From POTUS to SSOTUS, i.e., Supreme Seditionist of the US –after one recent telephone call to GA. [ sigh ]
ReplyDelete